2020 Publications
-
Gallo-Cajiao E, Morrison TH, Woodworth BK, Lees AC, Naves LC, Yong DL, Choi C-Y, Mundkur T, Bird J, Jain A, Klokov K, Syroechkovskiy E, Chowdhury SU, Fu VWK, Watson JEM & Fuller RA (2020) Extent and potential impact of hunting on migratory shorebirds in the Asia-Pacific. Biological Conservation, 246, 108582.
-
Harvesting has driven population declines of migratory species. In the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF), declines of migratory shorebirds have been largely attributed to habitat loss. However, despite concerns about hunting, no study has considered this potential threat at a flyway scale. We synthesised and analysed the current state of knowledge of hunting of migratory shorebirds in the EAAF to determine: (i) whether there is flyway-wide coordination for monitoring hunting; (ii) the temporal, spatial, and taxonomic extent of hunting; and (iii) the potential population-level effects. We conducted an exhaustive literature search, aggregated data considering uncertainty in different dimensions, and appraised hunting levels against sustainable harvest thresholds. We identified 138 references (i.e., peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, books, conference proceedings, technical reports, theses, and newsletters) as potential sources of records of hunting of migratory shorebirds of which we were able to obtain 107. We discovered a lack of coordinated monitoring of hunting, despite harvest being temporally, spatially, and taxonomically pervasive, including species of conservation concern. Past harvest levels of migratory shorebirds may have reached at least half of the flyway-wide sustainable thresholds in the EAAF. Despite our inability to assess current hunting levels and unambiguous population-level effects, it is evident that hunting has the potential to be an additional stressor on migratory shorebird populations interplaying with habitat loss. We therefore highlight the need to develop a coordinated monitoring system of hunting at a flyway scale, as past levels of take are likely to have been unsustainable, hunting still occurs, and the current thresholds for sustainable harvest have become lower as a result of declines in shorebird populations.
Download a PDF copy of the paper
Read the paper online
-
Ordóñez C, Threlfall CG, Livesley SJ, Kendal D, Fuller RA, Davern M, van der Ree R & Hochuli DF (2020) Decision-making of municipal urban forest managers through the lens of governance. Environmental Science and Policy, 104, 136-147.
-
Awareness of the benefits of urban trees has led many cities to develop ambitious targets to increase tree numbers and canopy cover. Policy instruments that guide the planning of cities recognize the need for new governance arrangements to implement this agenda. Urban forests are greatly influenced by the decisions of municipal managers, but there is currently no clear understanding of how municipal managers find support to implement their decisions via new governance arrangements. To fill this knowledge gap, we collected empirical data through interviews with 23 urban forest municipal managers in 12 local governments in Greater Melbourne and regional Victoria, Australia, and analysed these data using qualitative interpretative methods through a governance lens. The goal of this was to understand the issues and challenges, stakeholders, resources, processes, and rules behind the decision-making of municipal managers. Municipal managers said that urban densification and expansion were making it difficult for them to implement their strategies to increase tree numbers and canopy cover. The coordination of stakeholders was more important for managers to find support to implement their decisions than having a bigger budget. The views of the public or wider community and a municipal government culture of risk aversion were also making it difficult for municipal managers to implement their strategies. Decision-making priorities and processes were not the same across urban centres. Lack of space to grow trees in new developments, excessive tree removal, and public consultation, were ideas more frequently raised in inner urban centres, while urban expansion, increased active use of greenspaces, and lack of data/information about tree assets were concerns for outer and regional centres. Nonetheless, inter-departmental coordination was a common theme shared among all cities. Strengthening coordination processes is an important way for local governments to overcome these barriers and effectively implement their urban forest strategies.
-
Gupta G, Dunn J, Sanderson R, Fuller R & McGowan PJK (2020) A simple method for assessing the completeness of a geographic range size estimate. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, e00788.
-
Measuring geographic range size is a fundamental part of ecology and conservation. Geographic range size is used as a criterion by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species in estimating species extinction risk. Yet the geographic distributions of many threatened species are poorly documented, and it is often unclear whether a geographic range size estimate is complete. Here we use a large and near-exhaustive database of species occurrences to (i) estimate extent of occurrence (a measure of geographic range size routinely used in Red List assessments), and (ii) develop a method to assess whether our estimate for each species is complete. We use an extensive database of point locality records for 24 Himalayan Galliformes, a group of highly threatened bird species. We examine the chronological pattern of increase of geographic range size estimates and compare this accumulation curve with a null model generated by performing 1000 iterations for each species using the point locality information in random order. Using Generalised Estimation Equations (GEE) and Generalised Least Square (GLS), we show that estimates of geographic range size for most species has now asymptoted, and that the range size estimates have improved more rapidly over time than expected by chance, suggesting relatively efficient sampling over time. The approach used in this study can be used as a simple method for assessing the completeness of a geographic range size estimates for any taxon.